Category: FM Legal

Categories
FM Legal FM News Trending

From Rumor to Courtroom: Ray J.’s Allegations Against the Kardashians Make Waves

Ray J.
Image Source: Anne Cusack / Los Angeles Times)

Ray J. has built a reputation for his candid revelations and willingness to court controversy. His latest public statements, however, have placed him squarely in the crosshairs of the Kardashian family’s legal team.

Ray J. Climbs The Ladder of Success

Ray J. rose to fame in the shadow of his superstar sister Brandy Norwood. Although Brandy paved the way for her brother, he was determined to prove to the world that he could stay in the spotlight and make a name for himself on his own merits. He too demonstrated an aptitude for singing and acting, solidifying the age-old truth that talent, although not always distributed equally, often runs in families. According to Mississippi Writers and Musicians,

“He finished an R&B album before he could get his driver’s license. Ray J. has been acting since age eight in TV commercials and became a regular on Fox’s ‘The Sinbad Show’ at twelve. He also costarred with Shaquille O’Neal in an action-adventure film called Steel (KindredSpirits).”

Making His Way

Ray J.’s name isn’t carried by industry talent alone—gossip has trailed him like a recurring hook. Over the years, his reputation has been marked by ties to less-than-flattering headlines and messy news cycles. Lately, Norwood has been speaking out more than ever.

Whether it’s catharsis or something more, his candid streak continues to paint a target on his back. His latest crusade—speaking on the Kardashians’—may come with consequences far steeper than he anticipates. However, this is not the first time he’s tangled with socialites.

Ray J. Takes on the Kardashians: Part 1

In 2022, Ray J. resurfaced with pointed accusations against Kris Jenner, suggesting she played a role in the release of the infamous sex tape. According to TMZ, “In Ray’s 44-minute monologue, he stops short of saying Kris directly negotiated with Vivid Entertainment—the company that distributed the tape. What he does claim, however, is that two versions existed, one filmed in Cabo and another in Santa Barbara, and that Kris allegedly selected the tape where Kim appeared in the most favorable light. He even mentioned a third tape labeled ‘Intro.’”

The story was certainly sensational and raised eyebrows, but as with many Hollywood scandals, it eventually gave way to settlements and statements meant to put the matter to rest—at least officially.

Ray J. Takes on the Kardashians: Part 2

Due to Ray J.’s recent allegations, Jenner is now suing him for defamation. According to the New York Post, Norwood claimed he was working with investigators targeting the Kardashians. Page Six recounted his inflammatory comments during a livestream with Chrisean Rock that circulated on X: “The federal RICO I’m about to drop on Kris and Kim is about to be crazy. But he didn’t stop there. He reportedly continued, I’m talking about, I’m on the news every day. I’m gonna say a lot of s–t. Anybody that is cool with Kim, they need to tell her now, the feds is coming. There’s nothing I can do about it. It’s worse than Diddy.”

Not Backing Down

Ray J. soon found that the Kardashians weren’t about to let the accusations slide, responding with a defamation suit to defend themselves. The move prompted speculation about his intentions—is it lingering frustration over past scandals or something more driving the outbursts? As Page Six notes, Ray J. has previously expressed anger over the sex tape controversy, even at one point posting a since-deleted message that read,

“YOU f–ked with THE WRONG BLACK MAN krisjenner @kimkardashian.”

When Transparency Turns Troubling

Whatever the circumstances, Ray J.’s conduct appears anything but judicious. Even assuming, hypothetically, that his claims were tied to a broader racketeering probe, his pattern of airing allegations in public would severely undercut prosecutorial strategy. Investigations of that magnitude demand discretion, chain-of-custody integrity, and airtight evidence management. No credible investigative body would gamble its case on a witness so willing to compromise procedure in such a public manner.

Is it Smoke or Is There Fire?

Maybe Ray J. is blowing smoke—or maybe there’s more fire beneath the haze. Either way, a legal battle looms, and one side will inevitably claim victory, even if only in the short term. For the Kardashians, shutting him down would be a win. For Ray J., silence might be less a defeat than a reset, the quiet before another move. In the end, whichever way the tide turns,  it is a story worth following.

Written by: Renae Richardson

Categories
FM Community FM Culture FM Global FM Legal FM News Trending

Reopening Old Wounds: The Shocking Death of Trey Reed Sparks Outrage

Trey Reed
Image Source: People/Facebook/Trey Reed

The shocking death of college student Trey Reed has ignited not only grief but also outrage, reopening deep cultural wounds and demanding both answers and accountability. What began as a routine day at Delta University was shattered when the body of Trey Reed, a young African-American student, was discovered hanging from a tree on campus. The tragedy, both inexplicable and devastating, has left the community reeling.

The Impact of the Death of Trey Reed

Initial reports suggest no signs of foul play, with investigators leaning toward a self-inflicted death. Yet the investigation remains open, a fact emphasized by University Chief of Police Michael Peeler in a statement to Newsweek. Still, for many, the circumstances surrounding Reed’s death raise far more questions than answers—questions that can no longer be ignored.

The family of Trey Reed is outraged—and rightfully so. At present, they are fiercely demanding answers, with no intention of backing down. One of their chief concerns, beyond the devastating circumstances of his death, is the glaring absence of surveillance footage that could either confirm or dispel lingering doubts. Attorney Jessica J. Jones has been vocal in her criticism, calling the lack of cameras on university grounds inexcusable. As Jones is cited by Newsweek,

“Were there cameras? There should have been cameras at the university that could easily enlighten us as to what happened in the early morning of September 15, 2025.”

Pushing For Answers Amid Loss

Still reeling from the shocking and heartbreaking loss, the Reed family has also sought the counsel of renowned civil rights attorney Ben Crump, long known for his unrelenting battles against injustice. Crump wasted no time in condemning the premature conclusions drawn so far, insisting that nothing short of a full and independent investigation will suffice. Crump is cited by  Newsweek as emphasizing,

“Trey Reed was a young man full of promise and warmth, deeply loved and respected by all who knew him. His family and the campus community deserve a full, independent investigation to uncover the truth about what happened. We cannot accept vague conclusions when so many questions remain. I stand with this family, and I will lead a team of civil rights leaders and organizations in pursuing transparency and answers for Trey’s family.”

A Legacy of Terror

This horrifying incident has ripped open old wounds, reviving painful memories of a history steeped in hatred and marred by unspeakable acts such as lynchings. As the Virginia General Assembly has acknowledged, “Thousands of African Americans died by lynching. In the most comprehensive report on the subject, the Equal Justice Initiative estimates that more than 4,000 Black people were killed from 1877 to 1950—in 12 southern states. Yet the presence of lynching elsewhere in the United States, even in much smaller numbers, long served as a warning to African Americans, other people of color, and even whites seen as outsiders that American terror was never far away.”

Trey Reed’s Death and America’s Unfinished History

The haunting image of Reed’s hanging casts a chilling shadow, reminding us that the ghosts of the past remain unsettled—and that the echoes of such violence are not as distant as we would like to believe.

Attorney Jones has stressed that the family is approaching this tragedy with care and prudence, refusing to leap to conclusions. Still, they are unwavering in their demand for the truth that will allow them to lay Trey Reed to rest with the honor and dignity he deserves. As Jones stated,

“The family is not going to point fingers at anybody. We’re not going to call anybody names. All we want is answers from technology.”

Ghosts Of The Past Resurrected

Mounting concerns now surround what some fear is a disturbing resurgence of an old, haunting act. In 2020, a troubling rise in hanging deaths began drawing sharp scrutiny nationwide. As The Week reported,

“A sudden spate of hanging deaths involving African-American and Hispanic people is being investigated by the U.S. authorities as racial tensions continued to simmer across the country.”

The details were chilling. As further reported,  between May 27 of that year, one woman, four men, and a teenage boy—all African-American or Hispanic—were discovered in separate hangings across Southern California, New York City, Portland, and Houston. Even more unsettling than the pattern itself was the official response: every one of these deaths was ultimately ruled a suicide.

The Heart of a Nation: Trey Reed’s Death Sparks Broader Fears

Now, Trey Reed’s death finds itself at the heart of renewed fears, stirring the belief that far more may be happening in America’s cities, towns, and campuses than authorities are willing to acknowledge. His passing is not only a devastating blow to his family but also a profound wound to the culture—and to the nation itself.

This tragedy is about more than one young man’s death. It is a mirror held up to an unhealed history, a chilling reminder of unfinished reckonings, and a stark suggestion that perhaps society has not advanced as much as many once hoped.

Written by: Renae Richardson

Categories
FM Legal Trending

Rap World Shaken as Young Thug’s YSL Interrogation Tapes Leak

Young Thug YSL case

Young Thug YSL case

The hip-hop community is in shock after leaked interrogation videos and jail calls of Young Thug surfaced online. The Atlanta rapper, facing a RICO case that could have led to a life sentence, was caught on tape cooperating with law enforcement.

Young Thug Admits to Selling Weed to Lil Wayne

One of the most explosive revelations was Thug admitting he once sold weed to Lil Wayne. Thug used this detail to argue that there was no way he or YSL would have put a hit out on Wayne’s tour bus. According to Thug, their past dealings showed they were cool, not enemies. This claim directly challenges long-standing accusations in his case.

Young Thug Lil Wayne

Influencers React: “This Could Be the End of Thug”

The leaks sent the internet into a frenzy. Influencers like Charleston White and DJ Akademiks immediately weighed in. Akademiks told fans that most civilians don’t care about snitching, but he admitted his views depend on whether he likes the artist. He also suggested that Thug didn’t put anyone in jail based on what was said in the tapes. Akademiks also noted that Young Thug hasn’t been releasing any good music since his release.

Meanwhile, Peewee Roscoe, a figure tied to past allegations, addressed the situation. He argued Thug tried to pull him “out the hole” and that the narrative was being spun for PR and media clicks. Still, the tapes fueled chaos within the YSL camp.

YSL Members Speak Out

YSL Mondo went live on social media to blast Young Thug. In a fiery rant, he declared that Thug’s rap career is over. Mondo claimed God is punishing Thug for ruining lives and even called him “the first rat to ever go into the interrogation room and rat.”

Mondo insisted Thug should have returned home from jail, stayed humble, and focused on making good music. Instead, he accused him of “crashing out” and violating the terms of his probation.

Georgia DA Moves to Revoke Probation for Young Thug

Things got even worse for Thug after the Georgia State prosecutors and the Atlanta DA’s office filed a petition to revoke his probation. Some fans online speculated whether Thug was sending “smoke signals” for someone to harm DA Viverito, who has been leading the push to lock him up.

Instead of fighting silently, Thug went on to mock other rappers online. He taunted figures like Gunna, who was accused of cooperating earlier in the YSL RICO case.

Hip-Hop World Watches the Collapse

The YSL crew is reportedly in turmoil. The leaked tapes show Thug casually speaking on criminal activity tied to Atlanta. For fans, the once unshakable Young Thug empire now looks fractured.

Hip-hop culture is now debating whether this moment is Thug’s downfall or just another storm he will survive. What’s clear is that the industry is watching every move. The leaked interrogation videos have become a turning point, one that could rewrite Young Thug’s legacy forever.

Categories
FM Community FM Feature FM Legal FM Politics Trending

Leaders and Communities Confront the Harsh Reality of Police Accountability After Tyre Nichols Acquittals

Photo by Scott Rodgerson on Unsplash

More than two years have passed since Tyre Nichols endured a violent and fatal encounter with five Memphis police officers. In that time, his name became a rallying cry for justice reform, a symbol of the urgent need to address police violence. Yet in a verdict that stunned much of the nation, a Tennessee jury recently acquitted three of those former officers of every state charge brought against them.

For Nichols’ family, community leaders, civil rights advocates, and countless observers across the country, the verdict was more than disappointing — it was a jarring reminder of the persistent barriers to achieving true police accountability, even in cases backed by overwhelming evidence.

A Night of Violence Caught on Camera

Tyre Nichols, a 29-year-old Black man known for his love of photography, skateboarding, and his close relationship with his mother, was driving home on January 7, 2023, when he was stopped by members of the Memphis Police Department’s specialized SCORPION unit. What began as a traffic stop for alleged reckless driving escalated almost immediately into a brutal chain of events.

Nichols was forcibly removed from his car, pepper-sprayed, and tased. When he ran toward his mother’s house in fear, several officers chased and caught him. What followed was a prolonged, merciless beating — officers struck him with fists, boots, and batons while he cried out repeatedly for his mother.

The assault, captured by multiple body cameras and a police pole-mounted surveillance camera, showed not just the violence itself but also the officers’ behavior afterward. As Nichols lay badly injured, officers exchanged fist bumps, laughed, and boasted about their actions. They failed to provide medical aid for nearly 20 minutes. Nichols was eventually transported to a hospital, but his injuries were catastrophic. He died three days later from blunt force trauma.

Charges and Courtroom Battle

All five officers involved were fired from the department and charged with an array of crimes, including second-degree murder, aggravated assault, aggravated kidnapping, and official misconduct. The trial that has now drawn national attention centered on Tadarrius Bean, Demetrius Haley, and Justin Smith.

Prosecutors anchored their case in the disturbing video evidence, describing the encounter as a sustained and deadly assault against an unarmed man who posed no real threat. They argued that the footage and testimony left no room for reasonable doubt: Nichols’ death was the direct result of excessive and unjustified police violence.

The defense countered with a very different narrative. Lawyers for the three defendants claimed the officers were struggling to restrain a noncompliant suspect in a chaotic, high-pressure situation. They sought to shift much of the blame to another officer, Emmitt Martin, who had already accepted a plea deal in exchange for testifying against his former colleagues. According to the defense, Martin’s actions — not those of their clients — were the primary cause of Nichols’ injuries.

During the trial, one of the most shocking revelations came to light: Officer Demetrius Haley had taken a photograph of Nichols’ battered body after the beating and shared it at least eleven times, including with individuals outside the department. Prosecutors argued this showed a callous disregard for human life and dignity. Yet, despite this and the damning footage, the jury returned not guilty verdicts on all state charges for all three defendants.

Public Reaction: Shock, Anger, and Grief

The acquittals triggered a wave of public outrage. Shelby County District Attorney Steve Mulroy voiced what many were thinking when he said:

“It’s hard for us to understand how the jury could have found no guilt on any of the charges… We all saw the videos.”

Outside the courthouse, Nichols’ parents addressed a crowd gathered at the National Civil Rights Museum. His mother, RowVaughn Wells, said the verdict was “a slap in the face,” while his stepfather, Rodney Wells, called it proof that “the system is still broken.”

National voices joined in condemnation. The Congressional Black Caucus released a statement calling the acquittals “a shock to our collective conscience.” Civil rights leader Bernice King urged the U.S. Department of Justice and Tennessee’s Attorney General to intervene, declaring that the case exposed the reality of a system built to dehumanize Black people.”

Why Accountability Is So Rare

Legal scholars and justice reform advocates say that Nichols’ case highlights the deep structural and cultural barriers to convicting police officers. Even when there is clear video evidence, multiple factors can work against prosecution:

  • Jury Perception – Many jurors are inclined to give officers the benefit of the doubt, especially when defense teams frame actions as necessary split-second decisions.

  • Institutional Protection – Police unions and department cultures often protect officers, while legal doctrines like qualified immunity make accountability more difficult.

  • Burden of Proof – Prosecutors must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, which can be challenging when officers claim they acted out of perceived threat or necessity.

In Memphis, the SCORPION unit, created to crack down on violent crime, had been accused of overly aggressive tactics well before Nichols’ death. Critics say such specialized units foster a militarized mentality that prioritizes dominance and control over de-escalation and community safety. While the unit was disbanded shortly after Nichols’ killing, the damage — both physical and to public trust — had already been done.

Federal Convictions Still in Place

While the state verdicts were a blow to many seeking justice, federal charges against all five officers remain a source of hope for accountability. Earlier this year, the officers were convicted in federal court of violating Nichols’ civil rights. These convictions, based largely on the same video and testimonial evidence, carry significant prison terms. Sentencing is scheduled for the summer.

Nichols’ family has also filed a $550 million civil lawsuit against the officers, the City of Memphis, and Police Chief Cerelyn “CJ” Davis. The suit accuses them of gross negligence, excessive force, and deliberate indifference to Nichols’ medical needs. While monetary damages cannot undo the tragedy, the family hopes the case will send a message that institutions will face consequences for enabling such misconduct.

Remembering the Man Behind the Case

Amid the legal battles and public debate, it is easy to lose sight of who Tyre Nichols was before that January night. Friends and family describe him as gentle, creative, and deeply connected to his loved ones. He enjoyed photography, capturing sunsets, and skateboarding with friends. He had a warm smile and a calm demeanor.

On the night of his fatal encounter with police, Nichols was less than 100 yards from his home. He cried out for his mother not just once, but multiple times during the beating — a detail that haunts those who have watched the footage or heard it described. For many, that image underscores the humanity lost in the moment officers chose aggression over compassion.

The Larger Call for Reform

The Nichols case has reignited calls for sweeping reform in policing and the justice system. Advocates stress that meaningful change requires more than prosecutions after tragedies — it demands preventative measures and structural overhaul. Among the proposed reforms:

  • Federal Oversight – Expanding the DOJ’s power to investigate and enforce civil rights standards in police departments.

  • Ending Qualified Immunity – Removing the legal protections that shield officers from personal liability in many misconduct cases.

  • Use-of-Force Overhaul – Implementing stricter policies on de-escalation, banning chokeholds, and mandating immediate medical care for injured suspects.

  • Independent Prosecutors – Assigning police misconduct cases to independent offices instead of local prosecutors with ties to law enforcement.

Community activists also point to the need for cultural change inside departments, shifting away from the “warrior” mindset toward one of service and partnership with the public.

The Road Ahead

For Memphis, the acquittals have reopened wounds and deepened mistrust between the community and law enforcement. For the nation, the case is another stark reminder of how elusive justice can be when those accused are police officers.

Still, the fight for accountability in Tyre Nichols’ name is far from over. His family will continue to push forward in federal court and in their civil suit. Activists and reform advocates are using his story to press for systemic change, hoping to ensure that what happened to him does not happen to others.

Tyre Nichols should have gone home that night. He should still be taking photos, skating with friends, and sharing meals with his family. Instead, his name joins a long list of Black Americans whose lives were cut short by the very people sworn to protect them.

His story, and the national reaction to it, underscores a painful truth — that the fight for justice is ongoing, and for many, justice delayed often feels like justice denied. But as his mother has vowed, they will not stop speaking his name, telling his story, and demanding a system where every life is valued equally.

Categories
FM Legal FM News Trending

Shadows in Solitary: The Fight to Save R. Kelly

R. Kelly
Image Source: Antonio Perez / Chicago Tribune / Associated Press

On June 18th, shocking news broke that R. Kelly had been hospitalized after an alleged overdose. Details about his condition were not provided, raising many questions regarding his health while in prison. Concerns grew with later reports suggesting that law enforcement officials were targeting Kelly.

Kelly Soars

Kelly’s ascent to stardom was extraordinary. His career began to take shape in 1992, following years of participation in various competitions. As a member of the group MGM, he gained recognition by winning the well-known televised contest “Big Break.” In 1992, R. Kelly & Public Announcement released their debut album, “Born Into The ‘90s,” which went platinum the following year, as reported by the Associated Press. His success continued to climb, reaching a high point in 1998 when he won three Grammy Awards for his hit single, “I Believe I Can Fly.”

The Aftermath: R. Kelly’s Sentence and the Threat

The late 1990s, however, marked the start of Kelly’s decline. In 1998, a lawsuit was filed against him, which he settled. Another accusation arose in 2001, leading to another settlement. However, soon he would face consequences that couldn’t be so easily resolved. On June 29, 2021, his judgment day arrived. According to ICE,”

Robert Sylvester Kelly, the R&B singer known as ‘R. Kelly,’ was sentenced to 30 years in prison by United States District Judge Ann M. Donnelly on June 29.”

As of September 27, 2021, five years have passed since his sentencing, and the artist is now facing a battle of another kind, a threat to his life.

Blood Clots and Conspiracy

Kelly’s legal team argues that the overdose leading to the performer’s hospitalization was intentional. As reported by ABC 11,

“In the court documents, Kelly’s lawyers claim prison officials gave him an overdose of medication and ‘almost killed him.”

Following this allegation, the attorneys requested a temporary release for Kelly, but the request was denied.

The lawyers reportedly anticipated the denial of their plea due to jurisdictional legal constraints. ABC 11 further reported the legal team’s statement:

“We had no option but to take immediate action given clear evidence of a threat to Robert Kelly’s life. Yesterday, I made an urgent visit to see him. I can now confirm that this threat persists and is more severe than ever. Mr. Kelly remains incarcerated with blood clots in his lungs.”

The Conspiracy Inside

Blood clots pose a serious health risk and can be life-threatening if not adequately monitored and treated. Lawyers have claimed that the singer is in a critical condition, prompting questions about the motives behind this situation. What reason would prison officials have to harm Kelly? This is an important question that requires answers.

What we know is that this incident followed a recent legal filing. It was claimed that an inmate was allegedly instructed by prison officials to kill Kelly. Furthermore, there are allegations that the “I Believe I Can Fly” singer was denied surgery to remove his clots. Reports indicate that Bureau of Prisons officials interfered with the scheduling of a surgery at Duke University Hospital to clear blood clots from Kelly’s lungs by forcibly removing him and returning him to solitary confinement.

Incarceration and Injustice: R. Kelly and The Case for Humanity

This situation is indeed serious and warrants attention. It is hoped that Kelly receives the protection he is entitled to. Prisons are meant to be places of reform and rehabilitation. Those convicted of crimes are expected to serve their sentences as determined by the courts. Imposing punishments beyond the court’s judgment, especially if not sentenced to death, is inhumane and violates the legal process.

Watching and Waiting

According to the ACLU, officers are prohibited from using force with malicious or sadistic intent to cause harm. However, they are allowed to use force if it is a sincere effort to maintain order. Prison officials could be breaching the Eighth Amendment if they were aware of the risk of assault by other inmates and did nothing, or if the conditions or practices within the prison posed an unreasonable risk of assault. This principle must be upheld. This is a story worth watching as it unfolds.

Written By: Renae Richardson

Categories
FM Legal

Florida Woman Faces Charges After Spraying Bear Mace on Black Children in Alleged Racist Attack

Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on Unsplash

In the quiet suburban streets of Ocala, Florida, what should have been a routine, sunny afternoon for one young family turned into a harrowing experience of racial hostility and violence. An 81-year-old woman, Ada Anderson, now faces criminal charges after allegedly spraying bear mace on two Black children and their mother, an act many are calling racially motivated and traumatic.

The incident occurred on May 30 in Marion County and involved April Morant and her two daughters, ages six and three. According to Morant, Anderson had been a hostile presence in the neighborhood since the day her family moved in. The tension reportedly escalated over time, culminating in a disturbing physical confrontation that has left emotional and psychological scars.

“My kids were just outside playing with bubbles,” Morant told WESH-2 News. “They weren’t doing anything wrong. They were just being kids. And suddenly, this woman came to the fence with something in her hand and sprayed us. I didn’t know what it was at first—I thought it might be a gun. But then I realized it was bear spray. It hit us instantly.”

Bear spray is a highly concentrated form of pepper spray meant to deter large wildlife like bears. It’s many times more potent than the pepper sprays sold for self-defense, and its effects on children can be severe—causing intense burning, temporary blindness, respiratory issues, and deep emotional trauma.

What followed the chemical attack was no less horrifying. As Morant scrambled to protect her daughters, she heard Anderson shout racial slurs that confirmed the attack was not just random aggression, but a targeted act of hate. The scene quickly spiraled into a nightmare, with Morant’s children screaming in pain and fear.

A Pattern of Harassment Ignored

The attack was not an isolated incident. According to Morant, Anderson had been hostile from the moment she and her children arrived in the neighborhood. “She gave us dirty looks. She made comments. I tried to ignore her, hoping it would stop. But it just got worse,” Morant wrote in a now-viral Facebook post.

What’s even more disturbing is that Morant had previously reached out to law enforcement about Anderson’s behavior. “I called the police before this happened,” she shared. “I told them something felt wrong. That this woman didn’t want us here. But they did nothing. It wasn’t taken seriously.”

Unfortunately, this lack of early intervention may have emboldened Anderson. According to video recordings taken by Morant after the incident, Anderson was seen sitting on her porch, staring into her neighbor’s yard. In a separate clip, she was caught on camera shouting, “You’re not welcome in this neighborhood, you fking ngers.”

The videos quickly gained traction on social media, fueling public outrage. People were shocked not only by the violence of the attack but also by the blatant racism captured on video. Despite this, the charges against Anderson were limited to three counts of battery. No hate crime enhancements were applied—an omission many, including civil rights advocates, consider deeply troubling.

“This isn’t just about someone losing their temper,” said a representative from a local advocacy group. “This was racially motivated. There’s video evidence, eyewitness accounts, and a pattern of hostility. It meets the criteria for a hate crime, and yet it’s being treated like a minor scuffle.”

For Morant, the legal system’s response has been almost as painful as the attack itself. “They’re treating it like it’s just a simple battery charge,” she said. “But my kids were attacked with a weapon. And that weapon was used while she was screaming racial slurs. If that’s not hate, then what is?”

Trapped in Fear, Searching for Safety

In the wake of the assault, Morant and her daughters are now dealing with the psychological aftermath. The family no longer feels safe in their home. What was once meant to be a peaceful space for growth and childhood now feels like a prison lined with fear.

“My daughters don’t want to go outside anymore,” Morant said. “They cry when I suggest going out to play. That backyard used to be their favorite place, and now it’s the scene of a nightmare.”

Morant says that Anderson’s age doesn’t diminish the danger she poses. “People keep saying, ‘She’s 81, maybe she’s confused, maybe she’s just old.’ But hate doesn’t come with an expiration date,” she said. “She knew what she was doing. She didn’t just spray bear mace by accident—she aimed it. She spoke clearly. That’s not confusion. That’s calculated.”

The fundraiser has resonated with people across the country. Messages of support and donations have been pouring in from those who believe that no family should have to endure such hate simply for existing. Many donors have commented on the post, expressing their outrage and offering words of encouragement to Morant and her children.

A Call for True Accountability

The case has become a flashpoint in ongoing national conversations about racial justice and how the legal system handles racially motivated crimes—especially when the perpetrator is white and elderly. Advocates and supporters of the Morant family are calling for prosecutors to revisit the case and add hate crime charges, which could carry more severe penalties and reflect the true nature of the incident.

“There’s a disturbing trend of minimizing racist attacks, especially when older white people are involved,” said one activist. “We see it time and time again—people dismissing these acts as harmless or unintentional. But there’s nothing harmless about spraying bear mace on children.”

Florida law does allow for hate crime enhancements, meaning a basic charge like battery can be elevated if the crime was motivated by race, ethnicity, religion, or other protected categories. But proving intent often requires additional effort, and many prosecutors hesitate to pursue those charges unless they are absolutely certain they can win in court.

Still, for Morant, the lack of hate crime designation feels like a betrayal. “What else do they need?” she asked. “There’s video. There’s audio. There are witnesses. If this doesn’t qualify as a hate crime, then what does?”

Legal experts have echoed her frustration, pointing out that the burden of proof for hate crime charges often leads to under-enforcement. “It’s not that the law doesn’t exist,” one Florida-based lawyer explained. “It’s that the will to use it isn’t always there.”

As the case develops, public pressure continues to mount. Social media users, journalists, and civil rights groups have all weighed in, demanding that the judicial system treat this incident with the gravity it deserves.

Final Thoughts: A Mother’s Resolve

As of now, Anderson remains charged only with battery and is expected to face trial in the coming weeks. Meanwhile, Morant continues her fight—not just for justice, but for safety and peace of mind.

“I never thought I’d have to teach my kids what to do if someone tries to hurt them because of their skin color,” Morant said. “But here we are. I’m trying to stay strong for them, but it’s hard. I’m scared every day that woman will come back. That next time, it won’t be bear spray—it’ll be worse.”

Despite the fear, Morant remains fiercely protective of her children and committed to finding a safer place for them to grow up. She says the love and support from strangers has given her strength during this dark time.

“People have been so kind. The messages, the donations—it means everything,” she said. “It reminds me that there is still good in the world. I just want to find a place where that good is the norm, not the exception.”

For those wishing to support Morant’s family, the GoFundMe page remains active. Every donation brings the family closer to leaving behind an environment of fear and stepping into one of safety and hope.

Categories
FM Biz FM Legal

Kim Kardashian Considers Full Custody of Children Amid Kanye West’s Controversial Behavior

Photo by Daiga Ellaby on Unsplash

Kim Kardashian is reportedly weighing the possibility of revoking Kanye West’s joint legal custody of their four children following a series of explosive actions by the rapper. Sources close to the family suggest that Kim is now seriously contemplating taking more drastic steps to ensure her children’s well-being in the wake of Kanye’s recent behavior on social media. The situation has become increasingly tense, leaving Kim with little room for compromise.

Over the past few months, Kim has endured a series of public and private challenges from Kanye. The latest incident stems from his increasingly erratic tweets, which have only added to the emotional toll that Kim has been enduring. While the couple has maintained joint legal custody of their children—North, Chicago, Saint, and Psalm—Kim is now considering the possibility of severing that arrangement, particularly due to Kanye’s refusal to respect the agreed-upon terms regarding decision-making for their kids.

This new wave of tension began on March 14, when Kanye and Kim entered into a mediation over the involvement of their daughter, North West, on Kanye’s track “LONELY ROADS STILL GO TO SUNSHINE.” Kim strongly objected to North’s participation, especially since the track includes a private conversation between Kanye and fellow artist Diddy. According to their divorce settlement, both Kim and Kanye have equal decision-making power regarding their children’s lives. However, Kanye’s willingness to disregard these terms is causing increasing frustration for Kim, who is now reevaluating her approach.

Despite initially agreeing to remove North from the track following mediation, Kanye eventually disregarded the agreement and shared the song on Twitter, further fueling the growing tension. His tweet, “THE MAN MAKES THE FINAL DECISION,” reflects his ongoing struggle for control, and his emotional outbursts about being separated from his children have been troubling for Kim. In one particularly inflammatory post, Kanye expressed frustration with what he described as the “KARDASHIAN MOB” and suggested that his parental rights had been taken away in favor of a larger agenda. “I DONT WANT TO JUST ‘SEE’ MY KIDS. I NEED TO RAISE THEM,” he tweeted, further adding to Kim’s concerns about the stability of their co-parenting arrangement.

Though physical custody has never been a major point of contention—Kanye rarely spends time with the children in person—Kim is worried about the growing unpredictability of Kanye’s actions. She is said to be deeply concerned about his inability to respect the legal agreement they established, which has led her to consider whether it would be in the best interest of the children to take further steps to protect them. While Kim has always been open to Kanye maintaining a relationship with their children, his recent behavior may force her to reevaluate what is best for their long-term emotional health.

Kim Kardashian now faces an agonizing decision. Should she continue to allow Kanye to have any say in their children’s upbringing despite his erratic behavior? Or should she pull back entirely to avoid exposing their children to further public drama? The stakes are high, and while Kanye’s influence has been minimal so far, Kim is no longer confident that she can trust him to follow through on the commitments they’ve made for the sake of their children.

For Kim, this is about more than just a custody arrangement—it’s about protecting her children from the unpredictable turmoil that Kanye’s actions have created. As she grapples with this decision, it is clear that Kim’s priority is the stability and well-being of North, Chicago, Saint, and Psalm, even if it means making difficult choices that will have a lasting impact on her relationship with Kanye.

As the drama continues to unfold, it remains to be seen whether Kanye’s behavior will push Kim to take the ultimate step of removing him from their children’s decision-making entirely. The world will be watching closely, as the consequences of this decision could forever alter the dynamic of their co-parenting relationship and the lives of their children.

Categories
FM Legal Trending

The Implications For Free Expression Following B.G.’s Recent Legal Challenges

B.G. Legal Issues And Their Implications
B.G. Image source: Julia Beverly, Getty Images.

PEN America is sounding the alarm over a federal judge’s order against B.G. The organization reports that the artist is being ordered to hand over his rap lyrics, an action seen as an attempt to subvert the First Amendment rights of an artist.

Rap Community and Use Of Lyrics in Cases

The rap community has been constantly fighting to prevent using rap lyrics as evidence in court. In 2022, several hip-hop artists signed a petition to end this practice. Unfortunately, the battle continues.

According to ABC, in 2023, in the criminal proceedings against Young Thug, a judge ruled that lyrics could be used. However, the use was subject to certain conditions. So, it’s no surprise that things continue in this fashion.

Legal Challenges For B.G.

In 2012, B.G. was convicted and sentenced for felony weapon possession and witness tampering. In 2023, the artist was released. Sadly, in March of this year, he was again facing legal trouble.

According to Rolling Stone, the performer was taken into custody for parole violations. The parole officer identified two reasons for the arrest. First, B.G. did not receive permission to perform. Furthermore, Boosie’s felony conviction prohibits B.G. from performing alongside him. As the publication continues,  the duo’s appearance together violated a federally supervised release statute prohibiting parolees from associating with other felons unless necessary.

Examining The Terms Of Parole

Is this fair? According to MSN, Judge Morgan, the presiding judge in the original trial, rejected the prosecution’s plea. In terms of B.G.’s sentencing and future release, the prosecution requested that the artist refrain from promoting music glorifying gun violence or murder. However, despite striking down the request, a compromise was reached. As MSN notes,

“The compromise required Dorsey to submit copies of all future songs prior to production or promotion.”

And thus, given these conditions, the current judge’s request complies with his release conditions.

Parole Officer Has More Concerns

So, what exactly underlines the parole officers’ additional concerns? According to reports, the parole officer was also concerned about an album Dorsey and Gucci Mane collaborated on. The primary rationale is that these artists share felony status. Again, this is in violation.

PEN America: A Voice For The People

What is PEN America’s role in this? PEN America takes pride in advocating for individuals and the free expression of their voices. According to the organization,

“PEN America works tirelessly to defend free expression, assist persecuted writers, and promote literary culture.”

PEN America’s Concerns

In light of the recent ruling against Dorsey, the organization has spoken out, raising concerns about the decision’s implications. According to a representative from the organization,

“This arrest is another example of the criminal justice system suppressing freedom of expression and preventing artists with felony convictions from continuing their passions.”

This highlights a crucial issue that requires immediate attention.

Written by Renae Richardson 

Follow and like FMHipHop on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, Spotify, and YouTube! 

Categories
FM Legal Trending

Judge Rejects Dismissal Motion In Astroworld Lawsuits: Travis Scott Faces Trial By Jury

Travis Scott Astroworld Trial By Jury
Travis Scott. Image source: Erika Goldring, WireImage.

As Travis Scott faces potential legal ramifications, the public is eager to see what happens next.

It’s been three years since the disastrous Astroworld music festival left the world in shock. Travis Scott was the main performer at the event. A staggering 50,000 festivalgoers were in attendance.

Despite warnings of trouble ahead, Scott continued to perform. According to a Billboard article, when asked about his decision to continue performing, the artist claimed to be unaware of the rapidly unfolding events. When the police asked if he had heard the audience’s pleas to stop, he replied that he would have taken action if he had. Despite his defense, he and the others involved were hit with multiple lawsuits.

Legal Defense Rejected

Forbes reported on April 15, 2024, that Scott’s legal team had argued for dismissal, claiming that he was not responsible for the safety failures that resulted in injuries and deaths at the festival because he was only involved in the creative aspects. The presiding justice, however, disagreed with this argument.

The Tragedy of Astroworld

According to multiple sources, over 2,000 people have filed claims against the performer. Tragically, ten people of various ages died at the event, with one being only nine years old. According to Vibe, all deaths were caused by “compression asphyxia,” which is caused by being crushed under the weight of a stampeding crowd.

Travis Scott’s Astroworld trial for the joint civil lawsuit is set to begin on May 6. It will be interesting to see how the outcome plays out and how it affects future artists.

Travis Scott, Astroworld Tragedy, and the Pursuit of Justice

The idea that many people attended a day of music only to sustain injuries or never return home is unsettling. It serves as a reminder of what truly matters in life. Nevertheless, achieving justice is the goal. The hope is that the families impacted by this tragedy will receive the appropriate compensation to which they are entitled.

Written by Renae Richardson 

Follow and like FMHipHop on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, Spotify, and YouTube!

Categories
FM Legal Trending

YesJulz And Ye Share Lawsuits

YesJulz Ye Lawsuit Battle
YesJulz. Image source: YouTube.

On March 12, a post appeared on Ye’s Instagram. “We have decided to no longer have YesJulz involved in the role out of Vultures,” the artist’s IG story read. “All the activity on her page and with our fans in the past few days has been unauthorized.”

YesJulz Ye Lawsuit Battle
The story on Ye’s Instagram. Image source: Instagram.

The same day, YesJulz received an email from Milo Yiannopoulos suggesting she no longer works for Kanye’s company, Yeezy, and owes $7.7 million due to “NDA violations.”

Since then, YesJulz, whose official name is Julieanna Goddard, has announced her own lawsuit and multiple accusations towards Ye’s team and Milo Yiannopoulos in particular.

Multiple YesJulz’s claims suggest many things. Ye is allegedly not the only one “with access” to his social media accounts. Kanye’s lawyer is “at the will of Milo.” According to YesJulz, someone also forged her signature on the aforementioned NDA.

YesJulz Departure From Ye’s Team

The announcement mentioned above on Ye’s Instagram provided little commentary. The email YesJulz later received from Milo mentioned NDA violations, but it’s still unclear what happened exactly.

In response, Julz went online to announce that Ye had never told her he was suing and that his signature was not on the lawsuit. “The letter of intent to arbitrate was very clearly written by Milo. Signed by Ye’s lawyer, who is also at the will of Milo,” YesJulz has explained on X. “If the suit moves forward and Ye allows it to, sure i may feel different. & i’ll do what needs to be done to defend myself. I have no fear because i’ve done no wrong.”

After someone pointed out that Ye posted the departure announcement of YesJulz on his own Instagram, the talent manager claimed that Kanye was not the only one “with access” to his own social media.

Julz Fires Back

However, days after YesJulz’s departure, Ye has not responded regarding her firing or the $7.7 million lawsuit.

This has seemingly led the manager to conclude that Milo is not the only person on the Yeezy team trying to harden her life. So she has fired back with her own lawsuit against the team.

“I gave everyone over a week to do the right thing and fire this pedo, pay me for my completed work and drop the nonsense intent to arbitrate,” Julz has stated on X. “I had to assume this was fake, but nope- its very real. So my response to it will be very real also.” 

YesJulz has also underlined that her main problem is Milo, “But i cant ignore that the rest of the team, including the founder of company, has been complicit. I have no choice but to fight back.”

The talent manager has a lot of accusations to make against the company. These include wrongful termination but also signature forging. “I was..sent a signed NDA two days after my “fuck an nda” comment with a signature that is VERY CLEARLY not mine,” Julz has stated on X. “Someone will be in jail as forging a signature is a federal crime punishable by up to 10 years in prison in the state of California.”

Ye’s team has yet not commented on the forging allegations.

Written by Nikita Serdiuk | IG: @nikitasrdk | Twitter: @nktserdiuk

You can also follow and like FMHipHop on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, Spotify, and YouTube!