Categories
FM Legal Trending

Cardi B Celebrates Victory in Mixtape Cover Lawsuit

Cardi B has pulled off yet another success in the courtroom, despite a recent barrage of stressful legal troubles resulting in a lawsuit against her.

With Tasha K, Jade, and Kevin Micheal Brophy, Cardi B faced many lawsuits and has repeatedly stood trial in recent months to defend her name. 

Luckily for Cardi B, the defamation suit with Tasha K resulted in a landslide win. She also only received 15 days of community service for the strip club fight that injured Tekashi 69’s girlfriend, Jade. Now, the “Bodak Yellow” artist can thank lawyers again for proving she didn’t misuse Brophy’s likeness on her 2016 “Gangsta Bitch Music Vol. 1” mixtape.

A W For Cardi B

A federal jury determined yesterday (Oct 22) that Cardi B did not misappropriate Brophy’s back tattoos for her risqué mixtape cover. Upon the judge reading the verdict, the Bronx star embraced her attorneys and appeared extremely happy with the outcome.

“I wasn’t sure if I was going to lose or not,” Cardi admitted after leaving the courthouse. Similarly to her assault case back in September, the “Shake It” artist faced many cheers and paparazzi outside the building. “I told myself if I win, I was going to cuss Mr. Brophy out. But I don’t have it in my heart to cuss him out,” she continued. 

It’s worth noting that Cardi and Brophy had a short but respectful conversation during court proceedings.

The trouble began a year following the drop of “Gangsta Bitch Music Vol 1.” The cover depicts Cardi B engaging in sexual activities with a man donned in some of the same back tattoos as Brophy. According to him, this caused “distress and humiliation,” although the man’s face doesn’t appear.

Copy & Paste

According to Brophy’s lawyer A. Barry Cappello, the tattoos are a direct copy from a magazine onto the mixtape cover. “At the end of the day, I do respect you as an artist,” the former tattoo model said on the court.

The “Up” artist, per usual, didn’t hesitate to jump to her own defense. She fired back on Cappello’s claims saying the mixtape artwork hadn’t damaged Brophy’s life. Instead, Cardi B claimed the ongoing lawsuits have impacted her personal life, pointing out she missed her daughter’s “first steps” due to the trial. 

Still, Cappello insisted the “WAP” rapper knew about the photo editing, which she denied assertively. The back and forth apparently got so intense the judge cleared out the courtroom and even considered a mistrial.

Subsequently, after the break, the judge condemned both sides of the argument, calling it “unprofessional” and “not productive.” Regardless, the questioning continued.

Cardi then claimed only a “small portion” of Brophy’s back tattoo appeared on the cover unbeknownst to her. The 30-year-olds primary defense was that Timm Gooden, the artist behind the photo, had fair use laws on his side.

Capello responded with claims that Gooden used Google to look up “back tattoos” to find his client’s likeness. But according to Cardi’s lawyer, Peter Anderson, Brophy, and the fictional mixtape man don’t match up. He specifically pointed out the artwork doesn’t feature neck tattoos, while Brophy does.

Swaying The Jury

“It’s not your client’s back,” Cardi said. One significant factor that likely led to the jury’s decision is the stark difference in the mixtape models’ appearance. Kevin Micheal Brophy is a Caucasian model and skater, and the artwork explicitly depicts a black man. “It’s not him,” she doubled down. “To me, it doesn’t look like his back at all. The tattoo was modified, which is protected by the First Amendment.”

She then addressed the lack of any real consequences from the mixtape. Apparently, Brophy has his own surf and skating merch brand that’s going strong to this day. “He hasn’t gotten fired from his job,” she said. “He hasn’t gotten a divorce. How has he suffered? He’s still in a surf shop at this job. Please tell me how he’s suffered.”

Although it wasn’t an easy win for the mother of two, it’s another task she can cross off her chaotic 2022 checklist.

Written by Dreema Carrington

Follow and like FMHipHop on YouTubeInstagramTwitter, and Facebook!

Categories
FM Legal Trending Updates

George Floyd’s Family Files Lawsuit Against Kanye West

The family of George Floyd announced on Tuesday that they would file a $250 million lawsuit against Kanye West. The suit is in reference to the rapper’s comments on the latest episode of N.O.R.E and DJ EFN’s podcast Drink Champs over the manner of Floyd’s death.

Following the news that George Floyd’s family was contemplating legal action on Sunday, the Witherspoon Law Group announced it would be handling the suit against Kanye West. The firm was retained by George Floyd’s partner Roxie Washington on behalf of their daughter. The attorneys also filed a cease-and-desist letter to Kanye over his comments.

The firm released a statement, explaining that Ye “knowingly made blatantly false statements about George Floyd’s death” to promote his business interests. They also accused the rapper of “wanting to profit from Mr. Floyd’s horrendous death and his family’s trauma.”

Kay Harper Williams, a partner at the Witherspoon Law Group, also says Ye’s claims cannot be protected under free speech.

“Free speech rights do not include harassment, lies, misrepresentation, and the misappropriation of George Floyd’s legacy,” Williams argued in her statement. “Some words have consequences and Mr. West will be made to understand that.”

Kanye’s comments on George Floyd

Kanye immediately faced backlash for his statements on the October 15 episode of Drink Champs. The rapper claimed that fentanyl was the true cause of George Floyd’s death. However, Derek Chauvin was convicted for the murder. Ye’s argument stems from Candace Owens’ new documentary The Greatest Lie Ever Sold: George Floyd and the Rise of BLM.

“I watched the George Floyd documentary that Candace Owens put out,” Yeezus argued on the podcast. “One of the things that his two roommates said was, ‘They want a tall guy like me,’ and the day that he died, he said a prayer for eight minutes. If you look, the guy’s knee wasn’t even on his neck like that.”

On Monday, N.O.R.E apologized for letting Kanye make his comments, as well as for not immediately checking him. In addition, the official video of Ye’s Drink Champs interview has since been removed from YouTube.

Written by Olan Bryant

 

Categories
FM News Trending

‘Orlando FreeFall Ride’ At ICON Park Will Be Taken Down After The Death Of A Teenager

On Mar 24, Tyre Sampson, 14, died after falling from Orlando’s Slingshot “Orlando FreeFall ride” at ICON Park in Orlando, Florida. On Oct 6, the CEO of Orlando FreeFall, Ritchie Armstrong, announced that the ride would be dismantled.

However, according to Armstrong, no one has set a date for the ride’s removal.

“We [feel] devastated by Tyre’s death. We have listened to the wishes of Tyre’s family and the community and have made the decision to take down the FreeFall,” Ritchie said in a statement.

The decision to make this change is highly sensible. What is the point of holding onto a ride that could endanger another individual?

ICON Park Agrees That The ‘Orlando FreeFall Ride’ Must Go

According to an ICON Park spokesperson, it supports the decision to remove the ride.

“Tyre’s death is a tragedy that we will never forget. As the landlord, ICON Park welcomes and appreciates Orlando Slingshot’s decision to take down the ride,” ICON Park said.

Moreover, while traveling down the FreeFall’s 430-foot descent at 75 miles per hour, Tyre Sampson plummeted from the structure. Aside from internal injuries, he also sustained head, neck, and torso trauma. 

However, after going to the hospital, Sampson passed away.

Orlando freefall
Orlando Slingshot “Orlando FreeFall ride” at ICON Park in Orlando, Florida. Credit: NBC News

Furthermore, Ritchie stated that Orlando Slingshot plans on honoring Tyre and his legacy both in the classroom and on the football field by establishing a scholarship in his name. Further details on the scholarship will come out after consultation with Tyre’s family.

Autopsy Report Results

In his autopsy report, the rider exceeded the ride’s weight limit of 287 pounds by about 100 pounds. Thus, Sampson’s family believes that the ride operators should have prevented him from boarding the ride.

It is tragic when the life of a person, especially one who has not lived a long life, cuts short due to uncontrollable circumstances. Before boarding any ride, those operating it must take all safety precautions.

In other words, riders exceeding the weight limit will not be able to participate in the ride as it is a risky undertaking. While some may consider it offensive, the rule is there to save one’s life and the lives of others.

Tyre’s Family Takes Initiative

Furthermore, Tyre’s family has taken additional measures to resolve the issue. A lawsuit was filed against the ride’s operator, manufacturer, and the amusement park, alleging negligence resulting in Tyre’s death. This included inadequate staff training and unsafe ride design.

During the investigation of the accident report released in April, it was concluded that Tyre’s seat was manually adjusted and unsafe. According to the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, two of the rides’ seats had their sensors modified to allow them to function. However, the openings on these seats were double the size of normal, which meant the gap may have widened just before Tyre’s fall.

Orlando freefall
Tyre Sampson. Credit: Facebook/Vanessa Rivera

We wish Tyre Sampson a peaceful rest and hope his family can find strength and comfort during their time of grief.

Written by Nikiya Biggs | Twitter: @BiggsNikiya | Instagram: ngv6236

Stay updated on the latest news by visiting FMHipHop’s retrospective articles.

Categories
FM Legal Trending Updates

Tiffany Haddish Settles Out Of Court

Earlier this month, Tiffany Haddish and Aries Spears found themselves being sued by a John and Jane Doe. According to the suit, it seems the two actors/comedians are being accused of trying to sexually groom a pair of minors, an incident that occurred some years ago but is now just coming to light. As it stands, the case is being settled out of court, so we may never know the full story.

New Details Emerge

From what we do know, according to the siblings, Haddish was friends with their mother. Haddish would tell their mother that she was taking the kids to auditions, but was actually filming sexually inappropriate skits. One of those skits has finally been unearthed, and doesn’t paint a good picture for actors. The title of the skit is “Through a Pedophiles Eyes” which featured John. In the skit, the child’s mom dropped him off with a pedophilic Spears. The skit then has the child not being fully clothed while Spears lusted over him.

According to Tiffany Haddish’s attorney, the victims’ mother has been trying to “assert these bogus claims” for years. Jane Doe was the one that had filed for this current lawsuit due to her now being of legal age.

There were conditions to the settlement that John and Jane Doe had to establish. The first was that it was to happen in Las Vegas and that travel expenses would be paid for. They also want her to publicly apologize for her role in the known skit and to recant her allegation that the suit was a shakedown.

Haddish has said that the skit was intended to be funny, but was not. She says that she regrets agreeing to participate in it. However, she has not yet recanted her allegation.

We will provide more information to this case as it develops.

Written by Justin Acosta

Categories
FM Legal Trending

Kyle the Hooligan Plans to Sue Company Behind FN Meka

Record label Factory New may have a massive lawsuit after a failed and highly controversial project called FN Meka.

Last week, FN Meka, the first artificial intelligence rapper, made shockwaves on social media. Unfortunately for Capitol Records and Factory New, the reactions were a mix of confusion and unhappiness. The virtual artist came off as a cheap gimmick for rap music listeners. Specifically, the usage of the n-word in a historically black genre like rap and a seemingly nonblack AI made many uncomfortable.

https://twitter.com/iamtemisanadoki/status/1562168799737962499?s=21&t=Wsog78Q-laUSmIrOqg9tDg

 

 

All the backlash subsequently caused Capital Records to drop FN Meka. One would think that’s the end of this story, but this saga isn’t quite complete yet.

The rapper behind FN Meka has revealed himself as Kyle The Hooligan. And according to him, there was theft involved in the creation of the AI rapper. Kyle spoke with TMZ Hip Hop this week and told the media outlet he’s seeking financial compensation from designer Brandon Le and Factory New.

Kyle The Hooligan Speaks Out

“Took the culture, took the swag, took my whole sauce. And I never heard from them since,” the upcoming artist said in an illuminating Instagram post. In the video, the Houston artist details how he wrote and performed Meka’s first three singles, “Internet,” “Moonwalkin’,” and “Speed Demon.” He allegedly never recorded payment or acknowledgment from Factory New. In addition, Kyle says he gave Factory New the ideas to form FN Meka’s aesthetic and regrets being unable to provide input. He believes that could’ve stopped dicey imagery like the image of Meka being beaten by a police officer. 

https://twitter.com/recodedpolitics/status/1562548761695784961?s=20&t=v4pO0KreVS7CMsJIi12msg

In a written statement released by Factory New backer Anthony Martini, he took accountability for not doing the proper vetting and revealed he’s parted ways with the company. “I joined the team in early 2020 and was named co-founder with my specific focus being business development and artist management,” he explained. “I take responsibility for diving into a project without comprehensively examining its history.”

According to Kyle The Hooligan’s legal rep Andrew Occult, Factory New still hasn’t responded to the lawsuit. “Despite multiple requests, we have not received a response from or been put in contact with Factory New’s or Brandon Le’s legal representatives, nor have we received any formal offer for compensation. We continue evaluating our options and are hopeful for a swift and just resolution to this matter,” he told TMZ.

Although FN Meka was short-lived, his strange existence still shakes things up for Factory New and Capitol Records.

Also, follow FMHipHop on Instagram and Facebook.

Dreema Carrington|IG@dr3amgirl79|Twitter: @notdreema

Categories
FM Legal FM News

Moderna Sues Pfizer And BioNTech Over Vaccine Patent

Pharmaceutical company Moderna launched a suit against Pfizer and its partner BioNTech on Friday. The lawsuit alleges that the rival drug firms misused Moderna’s technology to develop their own coronavirus vaccine. Moderna and Pfizer are the companies that helped curb the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, developing their shots in record time.

Moderna’s Chief Legal Officer Shannon Thyme Klinger issued a statement on the suit.

A nurse is injected with the Pfizer/BioTech COVID-19 vaccine in 2020. (Photo by Carlos Osorio/Reuters)

 

“We believe that Pfizer and BioNTech unlawfully copied Moderna’s inventions and they have continued to use them without permission,” Klinger said. The company filed its suits in U.S District Court in Massachusetts as well as BioNTech’s home country Germany.

The legal battle marks a turning point in the competition between Pfizer, a pharma giant, and biotech startup Moderna. Moderna had never sold a product before receiving FDA emergency authorization for its coronavirus vaccine in 2020.

Patent lawsuits are common in the biotech industry. Most usually play out over a span of years before winding up in appeals courts. It could be up to five years before the dispute between the two companies is resolved.

Pfizer responds to Moderna’s lawsuit

Pfizer said Friday that it had not fully reviewed the suit, but are determined to defend against the allegations.

“We are surprised by the litigation given the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine was based on BioNTech’s proprietary mRNA technology and developed by both BioNtech and Pfizer,” the drug giant said in an email. Pfizer also said that they will “vigorously defend against the allegations of the lawsuit.”

The two companies have made billions in vaccine sales. However, Moderna has said it isn’t seeking to halt the sale of Pfizer’s vaccine, recognizing its necessity in saving lives from coronavirus. The outcome of the suit could prove to be relevant to future use of the mRNA technology. The platform holds potential for future vaccines against diseases such as influenza and HIV.

Written by Olan Bryant

Categories
FM Legal Trending Updates

AEG Presents Takes Young Thug To Court

It seems like Young Thug just can’t catch a break. Currently locked up and facing RICO charges, Thug has other legal problems. AEG Presents is suing Young Thug for alleged money they report they are owed from the rapper and his team.

AEG Presents Claims Young Thug Broke Contract

AllHipHop reports that Young Thug and AEG Presents came to an agreement. Young Thug got an advanve of five million dollars from AEG and in return Young Thug would give AEG exclusive rights to all of his concerts.

AEG Presents logo
AEG Presents logo/ credit- AEG- YouTube

AEG Presents states that they signed a contract with Young Thug in 2017. They alleged that he broke the contract soon after. Claims suggest that Thug booked shows without AEG’s involvement and collected hundreds of thousands of dollars for the shows.

“Despite having granted AEG the exclusive right to promote Mr. Williams’ concert performances under the terms of the 2017 Artist Agreement, YSL and Mr. Williams immediately failed and refused to honor their respective obligations under the 2017 Artist Agreement by, among other things, disregarding AEG’s rights, performing concerts without AEG’s involvement, and retaining all proceeds generated therefrom” -AEG’s lawyer, Kathleen Jorrie

 

Young Thug
Younh Thug/ Photo Credit: Urban Islandz

AEG Will Sue Young Thug & YSL

AEG surprises Young Thug with a breach of contract. The entertainment company is seeking the five million dollars reportedly given to him and interest.

Additionally, AEG Presents says that Young Thug put up collateral to complete the contract. This collateral includes the Young Stoner Life brand, portions of Young Thug’s publishing catalog, and the Young Thug trademark.

What Happened Next?

Young Thug and YSL remained quiet on the topic for some time. Eventually they responded to AEG by allegedly stating the claims to be false. In 2021, both parties met but they could not agree on a solution.

AEG Presents continued the process through the courts. A judge didn’t hear the case because it was postponed due to Young Thug being arrested and hit with RICO charges.

Young Thug
Young Thug/ credit- Getty Images

The lawyers for AEG requested that they have extra time for their case. AEG want to continue their trial after Young Thug goes to court on his RICO charges. A judge granted them the extra time requested. The official case is AEG Presents LLC v. YSL Touring LLC. will take place in October of 2023.

AEG is looking to get $6 million dollars, the rights to YSL company and the name Young Thug and attorney fees.

 

Xavier “Writer X” Griffin | Facebook @WriterX93 |Twitter @WRITER_X_713| Instagram xaviegriffin81

Categories
FM Legal FM News Trending Updates

Snoop Dogg Requests Removal From Drakeo The Ruler Negligence Lawsuit

According to recent Rolling Stone reports, Snoop Dogg requested to be dropped from a pending negligence lawsuit. The lawsuit revolves around the fatal stabbing of rapper Drakeo The Ruler in December of last year. Drakeo, The Ruler, died due to a stabbing at the Once Upon A Time in L.A. music festival. Currently, no arrests have been made in the case. However, the late rapper’s brother, obviously incensed by the injustice, took to litigation.  

Background to the Case

Drakeo The Ruler’s brother, Devante Caldwell, filed the lawsuit last February. Caldwell’s lawsuit claims that promoters and venue staff allowed the gang members purported to have killed Drakeo inside. Alongside this, he alleges severe emotional and physical damage. However, several event staff are now fighting to be removed from the lawsuit. The attorney representing Snoop Dogg’s LLC, as well as Bobby Dee Presents, have officially filed with a Las Angeles judge overseeing the case to remove his clients. The attorney wants assurance that his clients will remain “off the hook” for punitive damages.

It remains to be seen what the result of the lawsuit will be. In all likelihood, Snoop Dogg will not face any punitive punishments for Drakeo The Ruler’s murder. However, the legal battles stemming from the unfortunate murder don’t end with Caldwell. Tiana Purtue filed a wrongful death lawsuit on behalf of her and Drakeo The Ruler’s five-year-old son. This lawsuit names many high-profile promoters. Bobby Dee Presents, C3 Presents, Jeff Shuman, and even the venue owners Major League Soccer team Las Angeles Football Club.

The lawsuit aims for upwards of sixty million dollars in economic and emotional damages. It seems likely that Snoop Dogg’s attorney will also request removal from this suit. Additionally, this lawsuit directly cites the tragedy at Astroworld, reminding many that venue safety concerns many.  

What To Expect 

Following recent tragedies like Astroworld and Drakeo’s murder, concert safety became a topic on many people’s minds. Many now demand that those responsible for concert safety should face penalties when tragedy strikes. The Drakeo lawsuits will become major determining cases for how these events will be handled in the future. This story is still ongoing stay tuned for future updates. 

Follow us for more on the topic @FMHipHop:  Twitter, Instagram, Facebook.

Ryan Fields

Categories
Cherry Juice Trending

Lady Leshurr Wants Money From Cardi B Over Old Song

Cardi B is one of the most successful artists out right now & came up in the industry through mixtapes early on. Like many other rappers before her & now, she would rap over other artists’ beats in these early projects. Lady Leshurr wants credit & compensation over Cardi’s early song Cheap Ass Weave which uses the beat from Leshurr’s song Queen’s Speech Ep. 4. “You mind asking Cardi if she can break me off a likkle change she used my beat/idea before her big break and is now a millionaire and I got paid 0,” said Leshurr on her Twitter page yesterday (August 2nd).

 

The Rest Of Their Exchange On Twitter

After Lady Leshurr made her initial tweet, Cardi B responded confused by Leshurr’s claims. She expressed on her Twitter account in response to Leshurr comically stating, “I made like 2 dollars of that song ….you want the other dollar?” Of course, things didn’t just end there as Lady explains she mainly just wants her credit. Interestingly, she also revealed that she tried contacting Cardi about it years ago through direct messaging. Leshurr ends off with, “I was cool wen I thought it was just YT cover but it’s on streaming sites as ‘cheap azz weave’ nw & urs comes up b4 mine so yes dollar & credit pls.”

 

Who’s Side Are You On? Cardi B Or Lady Leshurr

Regardless of whose argument you align with, both songs were undeniably impactful in their careers. Lady Leshurr’s Queen’s Speech Ep. 4 currently sits on Youtube with over 60 million views. Meanwhile, Cardi B’s fan base acknowledges Cheap Ass Weave as one of her first early songs that helped boost her career into what it is now. It’s a shame when business & the industry has to interfere with great art from talented musicians. Do you think Lady Leshurr should’ve called out Cardi B? Additionally, do you believe Cardi B should’ve at least given Leshurr credit for remixing her song? Read more of FM Hip-Hop’s featured articles today.

 

Written by: Oryah Brown | Instagram: @oryah.wav

Categories
FM Legal FM News Trending

Roc-A-Fella and Damon Dash End Lawsuit Over Controversial NFT

JAY Z
Roc-A-Fella has reached a settlement with Damon Dash over his plans to sell an NFT

Roc-A-Fella Records reached an agreement settling the lawsuit between the label and its co-founder Damon Dash.   In July of last year the label sued Dash due to his plans to auction off his rights to Reasonable Doubt as an NFT. According to Billboard the lawsuit centered on if Damon Dash could in fact sell off his rights to the album as an individual or if the album was owned by the label. 

Monday June 14th, both parties agreed that Reasonable Doubt was owned by RAF Inc. meaning no singular owner could sell off his rights to the iconic album.  Of note Damon Dash is still allowed to sell off his share of the company. It is unknown if he will do so.

 

The primary reason behind the label’s success is because of the status of the album.  Reasonable Doubt began the storied career of rapper and media mogul Jay Z.  The album’s place in hip hop history made it so valuable Roc-A-Fella sued before a sale could even begin.  This lawsuit is simply the latest in series of clashes between Dash and the label he helped to start.

A Longstanding Beef

  Dame Dash and Jay Z’s longstanding beef produced numerous articles, tweets, and discussions.  The former business partners and friends seemed to quash the feud during Jay Z’s acceptance speech for the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame.  However, the good will was short lived.  Not long after that the lawsuit was filed leading to more tension between the two.

This decision impacts many parties.  However, the most impactful is on the hip hop world’s use of NFTs.  Other rappers or producers looking to make use of NFTs as a money making option might be warry following this case.  While the case is settled more developments from Dash and Roc-A-Fella are expected.  

Ryan Fields